Incident investigation report
The incident report captures what happened on the day; the investigation report is the follow-up that finds WHY and fixes it. Use this form to reconstruct the sequence, gather evidence, get past the immediate cause to the root cause, and assign corrective actions that actually prevent a repeat. Blaming a worker is not a root cause.
Incident investigation report
Company: ____________
Jobsite: ____________
Date: ____________
Incident summary
| Date/time of incident and of this investigation: ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| Location and project: ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| People involved and their roles: ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| Reference to the first-response incident report / case number: ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| Investigation team (not just the supervisor of the area): ____________ | N/A · Action |
What happened (the sequence)
| Step-by-step timeline leading up to the incident | N/A · Action | |
| The task being performed and whether it followed the JHA or safe work procedure | N/A · Action | |
| What was different about this day (people, equipment, conditions, time pressure) | N/A · Action |
Evidence gathered
| Photos of the scene and equipment | N/A · Action | |
| Witness statements collected (separately, promptly) | N/A · Action | |
| Documents: JHA, training records, inspection logs, SDS, maintenance records | N/A · Action | |
| Physical evidence preserved | N/A · Action |
Contributing factors
| Task/procedure: was there a safe procedure and was it usable and followed? | N/A · Action | |
| Equipment/materials: condition, guarding, maintenance, right tool for the job | N/A · Action | |
| Environment: weather, lighting, housekeeping, other trades | N/A · Action | |
| People/training: competent, trained, fit for the task, adequately supervised | N/A · Action | |
| Management systems: was the hazard identified, controlled, and checked? | N/A · Action |
Root cause
| Ask "why" repeatedly past the immediate cause to the underlying system gap | N/A · Action | |
| Immediate cause (the unsafe act or condition): ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| Root cause (the system that allowed it): ____________ | N/A · Action | |
| Note: "employee was careless" is not a root cause; ask why the system let it happen | N/A · Action |
Corrective actions (in the hierarchy of controls)
| Elimination or substitution where possible | N/A · Action | |
| Engineering controls (guards, ventilation, barriers) | N/A · Action | |
| Administrative controls (procedure, training, supervision) | N/A · Action | |
| PPE where still needed | N/A · Action | |
| Each action: owner, due date, and how completion will be verified: ____________ | N/A · Action |
Follow-up and sign-off
| JHA / safe work procedure updated to reflect the findings | N/A · Action | |
| Lessons shared with the crew (toolbox talk) and other sites where relevant | N/A · Action | |
| Recordable/reportable status confirmed (OSHA 300 log; 8h/24h reporting if applicable) | N/A · Action | |
| Investigation reviewed and signed by management: ____________ date ____________ | N/A · Action |
Completed by: ____________________
Signature: ____________________
tailgatedocs.com · Free printable form. Not legal advice; adapt to your jobsite.
Common questions
▸What is the difference between an incident report and an investigation report?
The incident report is the immediate record: what happened, injuries, whether it must be reported to OSHA, and first actions. The investigation report is the follow-up that determines the root cause and assigns corrective actions so it does not recur. You do the report first, the investigation right after.
▸Which incidents should be investigated?
All recordable injuries and significant near misses at a minimum. A serious near miss is worth the same investigation as an injury, because the only difference was luck. Match the depth of the investigation to the potential severity, not just the actual outcome.
▸What makes a good root cause?
A root cause points to a system that can be fixed: a missing procedure, an unguarded machine, inadequate training, a hazard never assessed. "The worker was careless" stops the investigation too early. Keep asking why until the answer is something the organization controls.
A finding that a JHA was missing or wrong is common. Generate a corrected, task-specific JHA in minutes.
Forms record what happened on the job; the JHA, safety plan, or written program is what a GC, prequal portal, or inspector asks to see. Generate a verified, job-specific one in minutes.